<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New lens; Sigma 30mm f1.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/</link>
	<description>An Irishman's Fiery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: /~colmmacc/ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mini-review: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM</title>
		<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-50723</link>
		<dc:creator>/~colmmacc/ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mini-review: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/#comment-50723</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s a reasonably light and convenient lens, and it&#8217;s quietness helps too for taking photos without people noticing too much. At 85mm, it&#8217;s field of view - especially on a small sensor - can be frustrating. It&#8217;s not as verdsatile as the 30mm 1.4 (in other words, get that first). But at the price, it&#8217;s an excellent lens, ideal for people like me who don&#8217;t want to spend too much but taking good looking photos with a wide aperture. Great for portraits and street photography alike. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s a reasonably light and convenient lens, and it&#8217;s quietness helps too for taking photos without people noticing too much. At 85mm, it&#8217;s field of view &#8211; especially on a small sensor &#8211; can be frustrating. It&#8217;s not as verdsatile as the 30mm 1.4 (in other words, get that first). But at the price, it&#8217;s an excellent lens, ideal for people like me who don&#8217;t want to spend too much but taking good looking photos with a wide aperture. Great for portraits and street photography alike. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-33270</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/#comment-33270</guid>
		<description>Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushtick</title>
		<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-10324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushtick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/#comment-10324</guid>
		<description>Your samples are yet more confirmation that this is the lens for me.  Have been using Tamron 18-200, but can see definite benefits in using a prime and this seems like the best for my wallet, especially with the ability to take indoor flashless pictures (guess who normally ends up doing the office photos).  Thanks for taking the trouble to show us thecomparison.  Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your samples are yet more confirmation that this is the lens for me.  Have been using Tamron 18-200, but can see definite benefits in using a prime and this seems like the best for my wallet, especially with the ability to take indoor flashless pictures (guess who normally ends up doing the office photos).  Thanks for taking the trouble to show us thecomparison.  Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>that looks really impressive colm.. damn temptation. I though I was happy with the 50mm 1.8 prime, but it looks like santa gonna be getting some begging letters again! 
bob@rb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that looks really impressive colm.. damn temptation. I though I was happy with the 50mm 1.8 prime, but it looks like santa gonna be getting some begging letters again!<br />
bob@rb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conall</title>
		<link>http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>conall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2006/08/13/new-lens-sigma-30mm-f14/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>The question is though, did you get your camera back after these tests, or was it &quot;acquired&quot; by your assistant? *ahem* :)


I must remember to poke you about lens selection at some point, I&#039;m already interested in more, but I&#039;m resisting for now... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is though, did you get your camera back after these tests, or was it &#8220;acquired&#8221; by your assistant? *ahem* :)</p>
<p>I must remember to poke you about lens selection at some point, I&#8217;m already interested in more, but I&#8217;m resisting for now&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
