Comments on: Holy Orders http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/ An Irishman's Fiery Tue, 17 May 2011 19:12:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: steve white http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-321010 steve white Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:38:46 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-321010 people saw organised atheists and thought ha, ill attack that, AI were were aware of consequences re president council, i can't put enough qualifiers in these message for you not to find another another thing for you pick me up wrong on. AI doesn't have the money to do what you say so you decide to immediately call them idiots. your free advice colm is very bloody expensive people saw organised atheists and thought ha, ill attack that, AI were were aware of consequences re president council, i can’t put enough qualifiers in these message for you not to find another another thing for you pick me up wrong on.

AI doesn’t have the money to do what you say so you decide to immediately call them idiots.

your free advice colm is very bloody expensive

]]> By: Dave http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320880 Dave Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:44:20 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320880 @steve white: The difference between what Colm is suggesting and what is done is the difference between "motion" and "action". http://steveblank.com/2009/11/09/relentless-%E2%80%93-the-difference-between-motion-and-action/ @steve white:

The difference between what Colm is suggesting and what is done is the difference between “motion” and “action”.

http://steveblank.com/2009/11/09/relentless-%E2%80%93-the-difference-between-motion-and-action/

]]> By: The Irish Blasphemy Law at Zoomtard http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320855 The Irish Blasphemy Law at Zoomtard Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:49:43 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320855 [...] Colmmacc, as usual, has a fascinating take on affairs, including a sensible and mature suspicion of the grand-standing of Atheists Ireland. But may I propose that the actual way to get this law overturned won’t involve rude sayings posted on the internet but an alliance the atheists are unlikely to consider… for dogmatic reasons. [...] [...] Colmmacc, as usual, has a fascinating take on affairs, including a sensible and mature suspicion of the grand-standing of Atheists Ireland. But may I propose that the actual way to get this law overturned won’t involve rude sayings posted on the internet but an alliance the atheists are unlikely to consider… for dogmatic reasons. [...]

]]> By: steve white http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320839 steve white Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:26:47 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320839 there are numerous government reports already saying blasphemy should be gone, we don't need a another one, we may need a wider report on constitution, education to express AI position, I have already done a little looking around at academics, if you lend me the cash I'll hire somebody to do it. Other then that AI did as much as they needed to yesterday. there are numerous government reports already saying blasphemy should be gone, we don’t need a another one, we may need a wider report on constitution, education to express AI position, I have already done a little looking around at academics, if you lend me the cash I’ll hire somebody to do it.

Other then that AI did as much as they needed to yesterday.

]]> By: Digest – Jan 3 2010 – The Story http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320829 Digest – Jan 3 2010 – The Story Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:23:39 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320829 [...] Interesting piece on the possible non-illegalities and potential failures of the Athiest Ireland cam... of purposeful blasphemy by Colm MacCárthaigh. [...] [...] Interesting piece on the possible non-illegalities and potential failures of the Athiest Ireland cam… of purposeful blasphemy by Colm MacCárthaigh. [...]

]]> By: John McGuirk http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320824 John McGuirk Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:42:06 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320824 On a tangential point, I don't think it's a particularly genius PR stunt. I think the fact that it's been covered so widely has more to do with the attitudes of journalists than it does the newsworthiness of the action taken. Otherwise, I agree entirely. On a tangential point, I don’t think it’s a particularly genius PR stunt. I think the fact that it’s been covered so widely has more to do with the attitudes of journalists than it does the newsworthiness of the action taken. Otherwise, I agree entirely.

]]> By: Simon McGarr http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320818 Simon McGarr Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:03:27 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320818 Strategy is more useful than tactics. The current tactic is to provoke a prosecution (I think). That's a reasonable tactic, provided there is a strategic significance to its success. Currently, I don't know what that would be. Strategy is more useful than tactics.

The current tactic is to provoke a prosecution (I think).

That’s a reasonable tactic, provided there is a strategic significance to its success.

Currently, I don’t know what that would be.

]]> By: colmmacc http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320817 colmmacc Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:42:19 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320817 Dude, it's hardly blasphemy. Dude, it’s hardly blasphemy.

]]> By: steve white http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320816 steve white Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:40:04 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320816 no you just accused them of publicity hungry idiots no you just accused them of publicity hungry idiots

]]> By: colmmacc http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/2010/01/02/holy-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-320815 colmmacc Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:26:14 +0000 http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/?p=641#comment-320815 I've taken no issue with their submission to the justice committee, though have not read it either. I’ve taken no issue with their submission to the justice committee, though have not read it either.

]]>